05 / Phase 03 · MVP Development

Bringing the platform to life.

Development begins inside structured sprints — each producing a measurable operational milestone, each anchored to a deliverable the practice can see, test, and validate against the architecture blueprint.

MVP Scope

The foundational layer that goes live first.

The MVP is not a stripped-down preview. It is the minimum viable operating system — every component required to run the practice on the new platform from day one, with the optional surface deferred to Phase 2 development.

PATIENT-FACING

Onboarding & Engagement

  • Mobile-first patient onboarding + consent capture
  • Secure wound-image upload from patient mobile devices
  • Diabetic foot care intake forms with risk-factor scoring
  • Appointment scheduling + automated post-op check-ins
  • Patient portal with secure messaging
  • Telemedicine consult flow with chart context
PHYSICIAN-FACING

Clinical Workflow + eRx

  • Physician review queue prioritized by clinical urgency
  • Wound progression image comparison interface
  • eRx prescribing workflow with audit-logged actions
  • Consultation management + provider routing
  • Surgical scheduling + post-operative tracking
  • Inter-provider secure consult notes
OPERATIONAL

Administrative Control

  • Multi-location management console
  • Role-based permissions (President, MD, office mgr, billing)
  • Scheduling coordination across practices
  • Operational + financial KPI dashboards
  • User provisioning + access reviews
  • Audit log visibility for ownership
INFRASTRUCTURE

Foundation Layer

  • HIPAA-eligible cloud deployment (AWS / Azure Healthcare)
  • Encrypted PHI handling at rest + in transit
  • Audit logging + retention infrastructure
  • MFA-enabled authentication for all clinical roles
  • BAA-supported vendor integrations
  • Staging + production environments + rollback discipline
The HIPAA Hybrid Strategy

Custom where it matters. Vendor-backed where it accelerates.

Modern healthcare infrastructure is rarely built entirely from scratch — and rarely should be. The hybrid integration strategy combines custom-engineered workflows with HIPAA-ready vendors operating under documented Business Associate Agreements (BAAs). The result is a compressed timeline, a stronger compliance posture, and a more defensible production environment.

Why hybrid wins on time, cost, and risk

Rebuilding every compliance-relevant subsystem from scratch — encrypted storage, audit logging, secure communications, identity management — is the most reliable way to overrun a healthcare technology budget. Established BAA-covered vendors have already absorbed the cost of building these subsystems to enterprise standards. Leaning on them where appropriate is not a shortcut; it is the discipline of senior healthcare engineering.

What gets built custom is the operational layer the practice actually competes on — the patient experience, the physician workflow, the eRx and consult logic, the multi-location operational model. What gets integrated under BAA is the security perimeter the practice does not need to reinvent.

Every BAA-covered vendor in the proposed stack is documented in the discovery deliverables, with coverage scope, data-handling boundary, and termination terms clearly defined before integration begins.

Why BAAs Matter Operationally

A signed BAA is a documented compliance perimeter.

A Business Associate Agreement is the legal instrument that extends HIPAA accountability from the practice to every vendor that touches Protected Health Information. Without a BAA in place, a vendor cannot legally process PHI on behalf of a covered entity — and the practice carries the full liability of that gap.

The hybrid approach we're proposing relies on vendors that have already built BAA programs at scale — AWS, Azure, Twilio, Zoom for Healthcare, Stripe, and the eRx clearinghouse partner selected during architecture. Each BAA is signed, reviewed by counsel, and documented before any PHI touches the platform.

This is also where the agency's role is structurally defined. As a business associate to the practice, our own BAA is executed during Phase 1 close — before any production-grade integration work begins. The boundary between clinical responsibility (the practice) and technical responsibility (the agency) is documented in the Liability Separation Memo, a discovery deliverable.

Execution Discipline

Sprint-based delivery with milestone gates.

2-Week
Sprint Cadence

Each sprint produces a demonstrable milestone — a working workflow, a deployed component, an integration validated against the architecture document.

Gated
Milestone Reviews

Payment milestones tied to deliverable acceptance — not to time elapsed. Ownership reviews before each phase advances.

Synthetic
Data Until Cleared

No PHI in any environment until BAAs are signed, audit logging is verified, and the security posture is validated against the Phase 4 standard.

Phase 03 Investment · MVP Development Defined precisely as a discovery deliverable · revealed indicatively on request
$165,000 indicative midpoint · scope-dependent

MVP investment scales with feature scope, integration depth, mobile application surface, and the multi-location architecture established during discovery.

Next Phase

Build is engineered. Security is enforced.

Continue to the security and HIPAA infrastructure phase — where the technical, administrative, and operational safeguards are made explicit.